Brevity is Power: Why Another Cour Won’t Make It Better

Journalism teaches you one thing fast; you’ve been saying too much. Stop. Cut the crap. Doesn’t that make for a more exciting read?

Yet, the standard style for an anime review online is overburdened with length. Paragraphs are used to explain what should be put in a sentence; the same thoughts are repeated in different words, or different buzzwords. This blog too used to pride itself on its ‘long sentences’, but that About page needs an update. Anime reviewing needs an update. Doing something for longer, unless you keep up a flow of new ideas, material and engaging stylistic features, naturally makes your prose less powerful.

The same goes for the shows you’re reviewing.

It’s easy to go there. You weren’t satisfied with what featured in the one cour the anime offered. The character development felt weak; the drama stagnated; the themes weren’t fully ‘fleshed-out’; there wan’t enough ‘depth’. All of these can stand alone, if undefined and unevidenced, as very casual, and not critical, viewings of a show; arbitrary phrases bolted-on from having been soaked up from the internet’s constant regurgitation of them, a poor state of affairs that would make Orwell turn in his grave. But what underpins them all? What one thing, if different, would give this show a ray of hope?

That’s it – it should have had another cour. It should have been 24 episodes. More episodes means more anime, which means more time to develop characters and drama and themes. Yes!


It’s hard to tell which ancient tome of misunderstanding gave the school of Anime Criticism this belter of a circle-jerk, but it’s not hard to search the internet for an example of its use. According to popular opinion, any dissatisfying show with one cour can be criticised for not having been two-cour. Did the writers fail to pace the show correctly? Don’t worry; the poor things would manage if only they had twice the amount of time!

From this logic, it follows that a crap painting would be better if it was on a canvas twice its size; a terrible novel can be redeemed by fattening it out; bad cooking is okay if you get seconds. Is it your place to say, when the teacher hands back your essay with a big red ‘F’ slapped on it, that it would have been better if she’d allowed you two thousand words instead of one thousand?

This also means we’re supposed to not care a toss about how a show could be reorganised within its given limits to make a stronger narrative, or how something could be boiled down into a shorter and more succinct form, like a movie. You never hear anyone say we should take away airtime from an anime. As if there’s a shortage.

Why is the short – the minuscule, even – never valued in online criticism? We keep saying ‘less is more’ in fashion, but become gluttons in front of the screen. Then again, ‘less is more’ is as non-intrinsic for anime as the ‘more is more’ two-cour circle-jerk. We should rather say that brevity means power. Precise storytelling, trimmed down to only the most succulent morsels of flesh, is the best thing to take a bite out of.

If we can make something as treasurable as Eve no Jikan in the space of six irregular-length episodes, and something as instantly satisfying as the currently airing three-minute short Ojisan to Marshmallow, the one-cour show you’re about to criticise could be made to be great within its normal airtime. A bad anime does not need more space to be successful, unless you’re advocating that bad artist should get twice as much time to bore us to tears, or that you’re too slow to enjoy something ‘short’ (as if thirteen episodes is ‘short’). Look at Sushi Police. Could they make a better show if it was full length? Sure, maybe. Your guess is as good as mine.

Would extending the length of it immediately make it better? Inarguable.

Note that this lines up with some of Christ’s non-christianity-specific teaching: the Parable of the Ten Minas. A king entrusts a small amount of wealth to someone, and they turn it into double the profit; the king, pleased, puts them in charge of parts of his kingdom, a much larger amount of wealth. The man who burys his wealth rather than making it prosper loses that and more, for he has not been faithful with what he was given. When it comes to business, you use wealth to gain more wealth. That’s it.

The same ideology is prevalent in TV show The Apprentice’s weekly tasks and board-room terrors; candidates are tested to see if they can handle small aspects of business in order to see if they are worth investing big money into. Those who aren’t are fired, a rejection from the business kingdom they pursued as permanent as the rejection of the fearful servant in Christ’s story.

You, the critic, the speaker and swayer of public opinion, are a king of Christ’s parable, the man on the business end of the boardroom. You entrust your time – a resource of wealth for the busy blogger – to anime, and expect to get repaid for your small investment. If you are not rewarded by a show, by a writer, why would you theoretically entrust that show, that writer, to have twice as much of your time? If they can’t impress you with one cour, chances are they’ll bore you to death with two. Just look what happened to Sword Art Online when it tried to reach into a longer narrative instead of properly wrapping up the Aincrad arc.

With anime split between being one and two-cour, it’s a temptation to default to wishful thinking rather than properly assessing a show on its existing merits. Saying a story ought to be stretched out to cover another cour says nothing; you’re presupposing the value of four non-existent hours of entertainment, and the evidence is against you. Say something could be shorter, however, and you’re on to a much more interesting argument. You can say what’s inessential and argue that the focus on something else should be in its place, or, if it’s in incredible overabundance, that the show ought to cut all of it out entirely and have a shorter airtime. If you can liberate yourself from the one/two-cour dichotamy, all the better. Movies exist too.

Any self-help book on creative writing will teach you to cut the fat from your work to make it a lean, mean imagination-provoking machine. Online critics should be encouraging the same for anime.

Life’s too short to miss the short things in life.


Current theme music: Cosmo’s Midnight – Falling Out (feat. Lido)

Published by


The internet's finest Loliconnoisseur

14 thoughts on “Brevity is Power: Why Another Cour Won’t Make It Better”

  1. Interesting read.

    I admit that I am still guilty of wanting to make what I write looks “full”. 200 characters seem small, childish, and make me feel like nothing has been done even though I’ve said everything I have to say.

    My language teacher once said, “If you’re writing something and one sentence is enough, then write one sentence and you’re done”. Since then I stopped caring about length and try to feel less guilt when writing something that’s only 200 – 300 characters or less. So far it’s working wonders.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. It’s a lot down to how our mind thinks in those ‘full’ phrases and sentences. Writing, however, shouldn’t read like that – it should read in a way that inspires that to happen in the other person. ‘Show, don’t tell’ for certain details in creative writing is one example of this; succinct journalistic style is another.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I’m pretty much guilty of writing too much. However at the same time I’m self-aware of it. Hence why I try to cut down the length of writing in my post. There is a word for this; retention. Retention is the ability to keep your readers / viewers interested and tentative. Giving out as much information, without over loading them or dragging things out. If you can’t keep the retention, then you might have a problem. You’re going to lose the reader / viewer; first impression counts. Big time.

    Using ‘fancy words’ or technical words, may keep the reader from going off else where. However the real magic is in fact; having a post / writing that flows. If the post / writing flows naturally then people will stay and read. Irrespective of the length. If there is a massive block of texts and it doesn’t flow or bores people, then they will more or less just go.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Interesting article. I couldn’t help but think this was somewhat spurred on by Lyn’s review on Charlotte (this was further corroborated by your comment on her post). Just a side observation of mine, though.

    It is perhaps all a ‘what-if’. If the same studio and production team got another few episodes to work on, it is likely they wouldn’t have done a better job at telling the story. One reason is, as you alluded to, because it is an fundamental flaw in quality of the team that perhaps can’t be cured just by having extra time. However, anime production isn’t that straightforward (assuming Shirobako reflects more or less how it is done) – it contains more of other people-influenced elements that may affect how the final product turns out to be, and these details may not be known to its public viewers. Perhaps the series may have been ‘saved’ by extra time, perhaps it wouldn’t.

    Ultimately, I think what is important is whether while acknowledging the presence of poor storytelling, it severely affects one’s enjoyment of the show. If, as you did, one views it as a bad investment of one’s time, then yes, it is probably trash. If there are other positive factors of the show that on balance, cancel out on this negative one, then perhaps your experience of the show is still a largely enjoyable one. Good reviews are perhaps but mere opinions, but what is crucial is that they must be properly substantiated while the writer acknowledges that they may very well be swayed by subjective preferences (like being able to overlook bad pacing if the story still manages to pack emotional punch, sorta.)

    Liked by 2 people

  4. “If they can’t impress you with one cour, chances are they’ll bore you to death with two.” This statement from the article really challenged my thinking on how I have judged anime in the past. A lot of times I look at the length of the anime and write how much more the creators could have included instead of what is already there. A lot of my personal reviews on my blog have been based on longevity of a show, and now I know I will turn my focus to different areas. As a creative writer, I want to constantly improve, and your article really helped me out!

    Liked by 1 person

  5. One can rant and saver all they want the Anime is not getting any longer or shorter.
    Good or bad at some point we might all wish more episodes. or less.
    As you mentioned with the SAO it was felt rushed and the Second season just a bust.

    Be your very own critic Watch the anime. And with every Anime you would wish more or less.

    I do wish some would stop chewing on an arc or meaningless item and keep spitting out small crappy nothings to reach that 24 episodes.

    Good read and makes one have another thought on how to watch anime.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Aaaaw. But I LOOOOOOOVE more seasons. Although when it comes to anime like “Naruto”, I have to agree with your position. But anyway, if a premise is strong enough and proves to be popular the first time around, of course the producers will be thinking more money if they make another season, regardless of whether the series need it or not. I guess it depends on the series. Some series are better with one or more seasons, but others are unfortunately need only one.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. It depends on the completeness of the story, I guess. Some cries for second cours want the story as it stands to be expanded into double the length, and that’s what I never find any logic in.

      Thanks for stopping by!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I can understand those who want more seasons. More often than not, I’m one of them. Although I often find myself disappointed whenever an extra season destroys what would’ve been an excellent conclusion in the previous one.

        Liked by 1 person

  7. I definitely agree with what you’ve wrote. Sometimes I feel like I want more episodes in a series if it hasn’t been fleshed but what’s to say that more episodes will give me what I’m looking for. I do think it’s a shame that if a short series hasn’t really given the viewer enough then it’s more or less lost its chance to impress as adding more episodes can make things more convoluted. This is a great read!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s